More photos at my Flickr page

About

  • I’m Miguel Centellas, a political science professor at Mount St. Mary’s University. Because of academic interests, I post frequently on Bolivian politics. I also occasionally discuss interesting books, pop culture, and daily life in Baltimore.
  • Send questions & comments by email.

The Coffee Table

The Reference Desk

Noticias de Bolivia

  • A selected list of Bolivian news media:
  • Blogroll

Tensions continue in Bolivia

December 15, 2007
Tags:

Today will be an interesting day in Bolivia. In La Paz, the government & its supporters are celebrating the new constitution (CPE), w/ a march through the city. Meanwhile, many in Santa Cruz will celebrate the region’s self-declared autonomy. So will Beni, Pando, and Tarija. And Chuquisaca is moving in that direction, too. All five departments have either finished “autonomic statutes” or are working on them. Santa Cruz is preparing to hold its own referendum election.

Technically, of course, none of the autonomic statutes are “legal” (in the sense that the state empowered people to draft them). Then again, very little of the process by which the CPE was approved was “legal” (in the sense that it followed established procedures set by law), either. So if the measure of validity is “popular” legitimacy (as if a Rousseauian “popular will” can ever be divined), then it’s going to be a very prickly business to determine which is more legitimate—or if they both are.

Meanwhile, the government is sending as many as 400 police to Santa Cruz & reinforcing its garrisons elsewhere. Social organizations loyal to MAS have also mobilized against Santa Cruz, closing the city off from the rest of the country w/ road blockades. So, even as we head into the holidays & the “typical” protest season has long come to an end, the tension continues to escalate.

Post this to: Digg del.icio.us Facebook Newsvine reddit Technorati Google


Comments

I think it is interesting to see both sides arguing whose document is more 'legal' and 'legitimate'. Maybe I am not looking hard enough, but I could not find who created the statute in SCZ. At least in the C.A., the delegates were elected.

What I also couldn't understand is where Sucre fits in the mix. I read somewhere that Sucre would become the capital of these new autonomous regions.

Posted by eddie December 15, 2007 3:33 PM

    The Santa Cruz statute was crafted by the "Asamblea de la Cruceñidad" (though I'm not entirely how "legitimately elected" its membership is. Then again, the CA was elected, but many of its members were not present at the votes to approve the CPE.

    But let's be clear: the four (or five, including Chuquisaca) departments are NOT declaring secession, but rather moving forward w/ plans for greater departmental autonomy (which, theoretically, is included in the new CPE). As such, one of their proposals calls for recognizing Sucre as the capital of Bolivia (not of some separate country).

    Posted by mcentellas December 15, 2007 6:54 PM

      The people who wrote the Santa Cruz Statute were all elected officials from this department.

      None of the people who made up the Asamblea PRE Autonómica were elected for "the purpose of writing an Autonomous Statute", nevertheless, they are the people elected in Santa Cruz as Diputados, Senadores, Consejeros Departamentales, Consejeros Municipales, Alcaldes and Constituyentistas by direct vote of the electors.

      Anyway, this Statute is going to be put into consideration of the Santa Cruz people in a Referendum to ask them if they want it or not.

      The so called "new constitution" was illegally approved by only 159 of the 170 constituents' votes needed to make 2/3 of the total members of the assembly (255), which means that the text of the new CPE needs to be approved by the assembly yet before it can be voted by the people.

      Posted by pablo December 17, 2007 1:33 PM


        The Basics

        Search


        Categories

        Archives

        Posta Classico