More photos at my Flickr page

About

The Coffee Table

The Reference Desk

Noticias de Bolivia

  • A selected list of Bolivian news media:
  • Blogroll

Signs for optimism in Bolivia (and some of alarm)

September 16, 2008
Tags:

There are signs that calm & order may be returning to Bolivia after several tumultuous days. In the aftermath of more than a dozen dead, 30+ injured, and as many as 100 missing in Pando, the government is seeking to reestablish control. There are still some blockades throughout parts of the media luna, as well as worrying signs of sporadic confrontations. But the volume of such confrontations has greatly diminished. These are optimistic signs.

Evo’s government is prosecuting Pando’s prefect (Leopoldo Fernández) for his role in the conflict. Fernández has a long political trajectory with Banzer’s ADN: He was elected to the lower house in 1985; he later elected as a senator in 1989, 1997, and 2002; he was Tuto Quiroga’s government minister from 2001-2002. Two other local figures will be tried: Miguel Becerra (ex-mayor of Cobija) & Abrahán Cuéllar (senator for Unidad Nacional, but caucuses w/ MAS). Becerra also has a history w/ ADN: he was elected to the lower house in 1989 & 1997. Cuéllar has a shorter political trajectory as a suplente1 senator for the new party founded in 2004 by Samuel Doria Medina (formerly of MIR). Additionally, the head of the National Police in Pando was dismissed for failure to control the situation; he may also face charges.

This so far seems like good news. First, clearly the prefect had something to do w/ the violence. He may not have specifically ordered it, but he clearly encouraged—he also took few (if any) steps to halt it. The inclusion of a MAS supporter (Cuéllar has been a “dissident” senator for some time, often helping cast critical votes to back MAS) suggests two things: 1) the conflict was more about “regional” loyalties than “party” loyalties and/or 2) the government is truly seeking to find all those responsible—regardless of partisan loyalty.

Second, the disciplinary action against the chief of National Police in Pando (colonel Silvio Magarzo Segovia) may shore up future discipline among the military & police. Both security services were grossly negligent—as they have been in numerous other recent occasions—by removing themselves from harm’s way & allowing the civilian-on-civilian violence to continue. Over the past weeks, entire military & police unites simply shut themselves up in their barracks or left the area of conflict entirely. This may serve the military/police institutional interests of preserving their own hides (and reputations). But it does little to protect the interests of a political state (which is defined by its ability to monopolize the means of violence in its territory). Hopefully, this will make other officers act to preserve & maintain order, rather than sit it out.

Meanwhile, international leaders are backing Evo’s government. In part, of course, this is protocol: heads of state tend to back other heads of state against coups, putsches, or destabilizing protests (regional leaders, even Chávez, backed Goni in 2003). But some (like Brazil) are sending strong signals that they expect to negotiate w/ both the government & opposition leaders as a means to find a lasting solution. The only wrench in the works continues to be Chávez, who is still railing against the Bolivian armed forces & threatening to intervene—even after the Bolivian government asked him to stop. The heavy-handed rhetoric (reminiscent of the American blustering of yesteryear) will most likely backfire, w/ Bolivian military officers already clearly irritated.

The surprising key figure in the current negotiations is Mario Cossío, the prefect of Tarija. As representative of the opposition prefect’s organization, CONALDE (National Democratic Council), Cossío is heading up the opposition’s current round of negotiations w/ Evo’s government. Cossío represents a potential “third way” option. Rather than an ADN or PODEMOS figure, Cossío has a long trajectory w/in the MNR. He was elected a deputy from Tarija in 2002, and became President of the House of Deputies. In 2005, he ran as candidate for prefect of Tarija under an alliance between MNR & a civic organization (Camino al Cambio). He was the only prefect elected who was not an ally of either MAS or PODEMOS (in Tarija, Jaime Paz Zamora ran as the PODEMOS-backed candidate). During the first year of Evo’s government, the MNR (and UN) joined MAS in a loose coalition that gave Evo legislative majorities in both chambers (MAS has a majority in the lower house, but is two seats short of a majority in the Senate). Following Goni’s resignation in October 2003, the MNR has tried to reinvent itself as a “pragmatic national” party planted in the center—neither radically left nor reactionary—along the lines of its 1952 image. If Cossío is successful in his negotiations, he may give the MNR a much needed boost.

Either way, US-Bolivia relations will likely take a long time to normalize. There is currently no US ambassador in Bolivia (the embassy affairs are now run by the economic attaché); the consulate in Santa Cruz is (temporarily) closed; and the Peace Corps is on the way out as well (perhaps also Fulbright & other such programs?).

This may be good news on some fronts: Bolivia will gain greater maneuvering space, as it casts off US-imposed commitments (such as coca eradication efforts). But it may also mean short-term loses: the US is one of Bolivia’s largest donor countries (whether it is the largest depends on how the figures are added up); the US is also one of Bolivia’s largest export destinations (which may now be captured by more US-friendly Peru & Colombia, or even Ecuador).

The US has long ignored Latin America. After 9/11, attention has been focused elsewhere, and the region was almost thrown by the wayside. This has cost the US dearly. Not only is Venezuela a growing power in the region, it also looks to be linking up w/ Russia (the two countries are increasing their military cooperation, including upcoming joint naval exercises). Shortly after its invasion of Georgia, Russia made clear that it intends to reestablish itself as a major world power—one capable of checking the US. Basically, we are inching towards a new cold war (Russia restarted its cold war era long range nuclear bomber patrols several weeks ago). Now there is a report that Evo’s government is considering replacing US assistance in the drug war w/ Russian assistance.

There are many who will welcome the decline of US unipolarity & global hegemony. Certainly, it was arrogant to seek to be the lone superpower in an increasingly globalized world. But a new US-Russian geopolitical confrontation w/ Latin America as a battlefield is not good news—particularly if we remember the Latin American experience of the 1960s & 1970s. Bolivia needs to break free from the US orbit. But it does not need to be drawn into another geopolitical confrontation between world powers in which it will merely be pawn.

-----
1 Bolivia has a “suplente” system of parliamentary representation. This means that each sitting legislator (whether in the House of Deputies or Senate) also has a “substitute” legislator who can cast votes in the absence of the “titular” representative. Suplentes also enjoy all the perks of titular representatives (offices, staff, and parliamentary immunity).

Post this to: Digg del.icio.us Facebook Newsvine reddit Technorati Google


Comments

"In part, of course, this is protocol: heads of state tend to back other heads of state against coups"

OH MY GOD! so go ask in the US, about US attitude during about the cup against Chavez and go also ask in Chile about same during the cup against Salvador Allende , and ... and ... and ...

Posted by Eduardo Lamas September 16, 2008 9:23 AM

    The key word in that sentence is tend to back other heads of state. The word means that there are exceptions. I assume most people are well aware of the coups in against Chavez in 2002 & Allende in 1973.

    Posted by mcentellas September 16, 2008 9:40 AM

      The key word in your writing stile is ambiguity. That is what you think it provides you an easy exit. But, when you are pressed just a bit ... is when your anti-democratic, over privileged, fullbright worried, self arises in all his glory and shows your intellect to the world. Thanks for making your posts a bit more clear.

      Regarding the support that presidents use to offer as they "tend to" This from all possible cases doesn't look like that. They were VERY involved they had and emergency summit and offered FULL support by an UNANIMOUS declaration to the DEMOCRATICALLY elected president the Bolivia.

      Posted by Eduardo Lamas September 16, 2008 9:51 AM

        And they did the same for Goni in 2003. I certainly hope UNASUR can do a better job helping Evo than the OAS did for Goni.

        Posted by mcentellas September 16, 2008 9:54 AM

          Bolivia needs to break free from the US orbit. But it does not need to be drawn into another geopolitical confrontation between world powers in which it will merely be pawn.

          I can understand the desire to be free of a US or any orbit, but what the hell is Bolivia supposed to do? Small countries have little choice but to be in someone's orbit, unless they go wiht the wildly unpopular juche route. To be sure, Bolivia can choose in whose orbit it wants to be in, but it has to end up in someone's orbit. I think right now it's in Venezuela's orbit and so long as it choses to align itself with countries antagonistic to the US it will most certainly be a pawn between powers. Your pretty sentiments aside, Bolivia can't escape the firm grasp of geography.

          Posted by GS September 16, 2008 11:06 AM

            Perhaps Bolivia can't escape its geopolitical location. But it could better leverage its international relations. I'd rather see Bolivia cozy up to India than Iran, to the EU than to Russia, and to Japan than to China. I'd also like to see it draw closer to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru than to Venezuela. Those four area closer (they actually border Bolivia) and are good markets for Bolivian exports (unlike Venezuela, which is actually an export competitor).

            Posted by mcentellas September 16, 2008 11:38 AM

              Perhaps Bolivia can't escape its geopolitical location. But it could better leverage its international relations.

              Can't argue with that!

              Posted by GS September 16, 2008 3:58 PM

                mcentellas wrote:

                And they did the same for Goni in 2003. I certainly hope UNASUR can do a better job helping Evo than the OAS did for Goni.

                Posted by mcentellas September 16, 2008 9:54 AM

                -------------------------------------------------

                Are you talking about Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada?
                You do like Goni ? HUH ? A president who won with the 22.46% and a champion for the neocon economical policies that of course left the overwhelming majority of Bolivia in the missery without education and access to health ... but he looks more than yourself ! You like him. Don't you?

                Posted by Eduardo Lamas September 17, 2008 3:46 AM

                  Whether I like(d) Goni or not is irrelevant. The point I was making was that I would hate for Evo to suffer the same fate.

                  Posted by mcentellas September 17, 2008 7:53 AM

                    Eduardo, it would make it easier to read this thread if you weren't so full of assumptions.

                    Posted by Frank IBC September 17, 2008 6:40 PM


                      The Basics

                      Search


                      Categories

                      Archives

                      Posta Classico