More photos at my Flickr page

About

  • I’m a political science professor who posts regularly on Bolivian politics. I also occasionally discuss interesting books, pop culture, and daily life with a toddler. I’ve recently moved to Oxford, Mississippi.
  • Here’s my current vita. You can also view some of my recent publications.
  • You can also find me on Twitter & Facebook.
  • Send questions & comments by email.

The Basics

The Coffee Table

The Reference Desk

Noticias de Bolivia

  • A selected list of Bolivian news media:

Bolivia pre-electoral update

October 27, 2009
Tags:

Some new pre-electoral polls in Bolivia came out over the last few days, including a new Ipsos poll in today’s La Razón. All the polls make clear that Evo is almost certainly going to win reelection. The only question is whether he will increase his vote share (his “popular mandate”) from 2005 & whether MAS will be able to gain control of the Bolivian Senate (opposition parties currently hold a two-seat advantage).

Evo in the polls

So far, the campaigns have taken some interesting twists. Although MAS was able to (forcefully) reassert control over El Alto, a protest there last week by the city’s mayor (over the government’s decision to cut municipal funding) & FEJUVE (the federation of neighborhood associations) showed a potential disaffection w/ Evo from his strongest base of support. Coupled w/ growing murmurs of discontent among indigenous leaders (some of which dissipated after MAS appointee candidates resigned to make way for grass-roots indigenous candidates), this suggested potential slackening of support for Evo Morales from the La Paz altiplano, his strongest bastion of support since 2005.

The El Alto situation still isn’t fully resolved. The mayor in question is, Fanor Nava, whose political trajectory took him from MIR to PP (the party of former El Alto mayor José Luis Paredes, a current Manfred ally) to MAS (when he & five other PP municipal council members defected to join MAS). The trajectory (shared by many in the MAS ranks) led Evo to denounce the move as “prebendalism,” claiming that Nava & FEJUVE were being manipulated by “political” interests (i.e. because of Nava’s former membership in PP, now PPB, Manfred’s political banner). But after Nava resigned (as did the FEJUVE president, who went into hiding), the El Alto municipal council was unable to select a new mayor from among three contenders. Yesterday, Nava w/drew his resignation, arguing that he counts on the support of FEJUVE. This could be a potential problem for Evo, since FEJUVE is widely recognized as the most potent social force in Bolivia. As the backbone of “the El Alto street,” FEJUVE’s mobilizations in the past were key in forcing the resignations of Goni (in October 2003) & Mesa (in June 2005).

Meanwhile, the announcement that a faction of the UJC (the Santa Cruz regionalist semi-paramilitary opposition group that, until recently, was regularly attacking MAS supporters) had signed an agreement to support Evo’s candidacy (along w/ the fan organization for two Santa Cruz soccer teams: Oriente Petrolero & Blooming) was an interesting twist (see story). The UJC & soccer fan clubs (“barras bravas”) are instrumental in mobilizing young cruceño/camba men into the streets. It’s perhaps ironic both that they’ve signed a political pact w/ Evo, and that the leaders of the Santa Cruz regionalist movement now denounce them as being manipulated for political purposes (“prebendalism”?).

Still, the election polls are becoming interesting. I’ve stated before that I thought Evo would win comfortably, just as he did in 2005. All signs suggest that he has the support of at least a slim majority of the Bolivian population. And, as in the 2005 campaign, he’s attempting to shore up that support among the middle classes. But for the election to be more than a pyrrhic victory, Evo needs to do two things: increase his vote share from 2005 (win by more than 54%) and gain control over the Senate. Despite some gains (for both government & opposition) over the last four years, the political situation in Bolivia can best be described as a stalemate. And given that 2010 (when Evo & the new legislature would be sworn in) will introduce a more decentralized political system, failure to move the ball forward would leave Evo & MAS exposed.

Bolivia presidential election poll (mid-October)

What makes the latest Ipsos poll interesting, is that it points to a growing polarization. Currently, Evo is polling highs of 72% in La Paz & 73% in Oruro. That would give him clear, crushing victories in two departments, increasing his support from 2005 (67% in La Paz & 63% in Oruro). But this is matched by significant decrease in Santa Cruz (polling 22% now; compared to 33% in 2005) & Chuquisaca (polling 47% now; 54% in 2005). Still, Evo has made some interesting gains in Beni (polling 26%; up from 16% in 2005) & Pando (polling 35%; up from 21% in 2005). In every place where Evo is polling less than 50% he is either trailing Manfred or holding a thin lead (as in Tarija, where Evo & Manfred are virtually tied, w/ SDM holding third place). But in Tarija, where Evo’s 31% polling lead beats Manfred (28%) by 3 points, he is par w/ his performance in 2005 (32%). In these close races, the undecideds will tip the balance. Pando, of course, is the surprise. After moving thousands of new residents (and troops, who registered as residents for the election) into Pando, he has moved it into the MAS column, but only barely. The poll shows Evo leading Manfred in Pando by only 3 points (35-32); here again the undecideds could tip the balance, but this will be the contest to watch.

There’s every indication that Evo will win. And his victory will be facilitated by a divided, disorganized opposition (and w/ no new faces). But I see no indication—yet—that Evo has actually expanded his support. If the opposition can somehow gain momentum, picking up some undecideds (which still make up 11% of respondents in Bolivia), it could prevent MAS from winning control over the senate. At the same time, as tensions w/in the MAS coalition continue, these could become a new source of worry for Evo, who has to ensure that he can shut out the opposition from winning any senate seats in La Paz & Oruro.

Post this to: Digg del.icio.us Facebook Newsvine reddit Technorati Google


Comments

Miguel -

Please refresh my memory - if the winning candidate gets less than 50% of the vote, is a run-off required?

Posted by Frank IBC October 31, 2009 10:39 AM

    A runoff is *not* required if a candidate wins *at least* 40% of the vote *and* beats his/her next opponent by *at least* 10 points.

    So if Evo gets 40.01% of the vote and Manfred gets 30% of the vote, Evo wins w/o a runoff. If Evo gets 41% of the vote, and Manfred gets 31.01% of the vote, then there is a runoff.

    The way things currently look, Evo will probably get more than 50%. But he's also looking to beat Manfred by 20-25 points. So he's pretty safe, unless things radically change. That's why this is really all about what happens in the legislative side of the elections.

    Posted by mcentellas October 31, 2009 11:12 AM

      Thanks, Miguel. We've got an interesting few weeks ahead of us.

      It would be nice if the USA had a rule like that (though I admit I'm visualizing it in terms of direct popular vote rather than electoral college vote). If the USA had that, as well as no-confidence votes, the history of the past half-century could have been very different.

      Posted by Frank IBC October 31, 2009 3:55 PM

        Miguel,

        I just got back from Bolivia, mostly in Santa Cruz, and was surprised to hear the "Autonomia!" cry from the MAS candidates and propagandists in Santa Cruz. How did MAS suddenly become the party of Autonomia? I realize it plays in Santa Cruz very well, but how does it jibe with Evo's desire to centrally control the revenues?

        Posted by Mike W. November 9, 2009 8:45 AM

          What good would that do? Whens the last time someone won by at least 10 percentage points in the US? Reagan vs Mondale 1984?

          Posted by dv November 9, 2009 11:43 PM

            when was the last time a candidate won by 10 points? In the 80s with Reagan - Mondale i think. Probably run off would be more useful if US had more than two parties - red and blue, although i guess the two party system is a run off in and of itself. As far as the electoral college, I think the union wouldnt have lasted as long without it.

            Posted by dv November 18, 2009 11:39 PM


              Twitter Updates

              • My 5 most recent tweets:
                  Follow along on Twitter

                Search


                Categories

                Archives

                Posta Classico